Thursday, September 24, 2009

The deceptive DNA of Kyle Sandilands

The moment: 7.9.09: Sydney

Kyle Sandilands suspended again: this time for ‘concentration camp’ slur

Things aren’t pretty in Sin City for Kyle Sandilands

I say few things – most are manly – but on this, the Australian media has a collective case of trolley rage, and Sandilands  has been beaten down like he stole something.

Let me say first, Kyle Sandilands is not my homeboy.

In fact I wouldn’t let him anywhere near my home, and would prefer that he did not enter my suburb. Why would he need to – his pathetic and unfunny ego has it’s own postcode.

He is a monument to quality broadcasting -  just like cement can pose as architecture if you squint your eyes and turn towards the sun.

He should go into politics, because he is most qualified in Australia to be head up the Department of Ignorance.

In summary, he has all the charm and appeal of a pickled toad.

But in a good Christian way – I am going to be the only person in Australia who comes to his defense on this  (I now know how legal aid lawyers who have to defend paedophiles feel)

In a fun game of spot the hypocrite, let’s break down this news story……………………..

“Sandilands was suspended by 2Day FM for his comments that Magda Szubanski would lose more weight in a concentration camp”

Righteous: She would……..she would definitely lose weight in a concentration camp. I don’t think anyone could argue with that. It’s stating the bleeding obvious. That means it’s pretty close to being a fact – and when did stating a fact become illegal or unethical?

“Szubanski’s family is of Polish origin, a country where many of the worst Nazi concentration camps, including Auschwitz, were located”

Righteous: oooohhhhh……..let’s stretch it out……….way out……..SHE’S not from Poland – HER FAMILY IS FROM POLAND – where there were concentration camps. So she’s offended for her family, because they are from Poland. Note that Sandilands did not say – put her in the gas chamber in the concentration camp.

“Jackie O suggested Szubanski might not be able to lose any more weight due to her build”. “That’s what all fat people say,” Sandilands replied.

Righteous: Sandilands is absolutely right. If Szubanski didn’t eat for 12 months, besides being dead, she’d be a hell of a lot skinnier than she is now. It is a scientific fact. So she could be skinnier, everyone could IF THEY CHOOSE TO BE.

“Not being able to lose weight due to her build” is code from the Fat Lobby for “she doesn’t have the inclination or the discipline to stop stuffing her face – but even so, you can’t call her fat”.

Well, I can.

Magda. You are fat.

If we stuck you in the desert for three months, you’d be skinnier.

If we stuck you in a TV show without catering for three months, you’d be skinnier.

If we revoked your sweet tooth for three months, you’d be skinnier.

So the problem seems to be with the words ‘concentration camp’.

“Szubanski brushed off Sandilands’ on-air comments, but said they were offensive to those who had suffered in concentration camps”.

Righteous: Really!! Why?. Because they lost weight while they were in the concentration camp, and therefore are have acid flashbacks when the words ‘concentration camp’ are mentioned?. Do they grieve the fat deposits they lost?. Or was it a horrific experience?. If they constantly get up each morning and wig out because they lost 70 pounds in 1945 – I’d like to see the evidence. In that case, we should ban the use of the words concentration camp. I don’t see anyone doing that. I mean, it’s obviously too soon to mention the war – it was only 70 years ago.

Magda Szubanski, not only are you one of the most painful comics Australia has had to suffer through – you are a hypocrite, pure and simple – because you use your fat for laughs, and you play to the fat stereotype, and you do it to further your career.

But you can’t have it both ways oommpa loommmpa.

And regarding taking up the cause of concentration camp survivors – how convenient.

Did you ever do anything for them before this?.

I would be betting a decent sum that the answer was no.

This issue has been manipulated by two groups – the Fat Lobby & the the Jewish Lobby.

Both these lobby’s are insidious.

The Fat Lobby says you can’t call fat people fat, and the Jewish Lobby says that only they can refer to the Holocaust, and certainly no-one can make jokes about it (I’m sorry, I must have been to lunch when that law was passed)

It’s like black people using the word ‘nigger’ in every sentence, but when a white person uses it, all hell breaks loose.

It is hyprocrisy, and it is reverse racism, and it is not acceptable. It doesn’t matter who does it.

So Magda, why don’t you just stop eating three peoples share of their supermarket allocation – and this wouldn’t be a problem.

This incident has exposed you for what you are.

An opportunistic, talentless, humourless hyprocite getting up on your tippy toes to tap the glass ceiling of publicity for your own benefit.

You have moved beyond the literal to the absurd.

Yours, while wondering if a long-winded answer is better than a punch in the face.

Righteous

p.s. This blog starts and ends 10 minutes earlier, so you can fall asleep now, rather than later.

No comments:

Post a Comment